Thanks David. >>Every single one of the above needs to be able to access all of the mons and >>osds. I don't think you can have multiple subnets for this, Yes that's why this multi tenancy question
>>but you can do this via routing. Say your private osd network is >>xxx.xxx.10.0, your public ceph network is .11 I don't think is routing is what I am looking at. I can solve this even using NAT to isolate tenants. What I am inherently looking is multi tenancy in network isolation with the application i.e. either virtual NIC namespace like virtual machines or physical isolation of network and ceph applications inherently working with it. -- Deepak > On May 28, 2017, at 8:03 AM, David Turner <drakonst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Every single one of the above needs to be able to access all of the mons and > osds. I don't think you can have multiple subnets for this, but you can do > this via routing. Say your private osd network is xxx.xxx.10.0, your public > ceph network is .11 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
