That's very likely what I tried to do too. Since I can't, I'll have to live
with the "all in".
haha


Regards,

Webert Lima
DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia
*Belo Horizonte - Brasil*

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 2:53 AM, Christian Balzer <ch...@gol.com> wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 6 Jun 2017 08:58:07 -0300 Webert de Souza Lima wrote:
>
> > Hey Christian.
> >
> > Which settings do you mean? I played a lot
> > with hit_set_count, hit_set_period, min_read_recency_for_promote
> > and min_write_recency_for_promote.
> > They showed no effect when hit_set_count = 0.
> >
> Yes, that's what I meant, as in hit_set_count is an all or nothing setting.
>
> Quite a while ago when these things were added with Jewel I was clamoring
> for having a better control with respect to read and write promotes.
> As in having split
> osd_tier_promote_max_bytes_sec and osd_tier_promote_max_objects_sec
> into _read and _write parameters.
>
> In my use case I want all writes to go to the cache-tier all the time and
> have a mostly bored and decent backing storage, thus can get away with
> setting the cache-tier to readforward and go full blast on the writes.
>
> But that's less than elegant of course.
>
> Christian
>
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Christian Balzer <ch...@gol.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 02:35:25 +0000 Webert de Souza Lima wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'd like to add that, from all tests I did, the writing of new files
> only
> > > > go directly to the cache tier if you set hit set count = 0.
> > > >
> > > Yes, that also depends on the settings of course. (which we don't
> know, as
> > > they never got posted).
> > >
> > > I was reciting from Hammer times, where this was the default case.
> > >
> > > Christian
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Webert Lima
> > DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia
> > *Belo Horizonte - Brasil*
>
>
> --
> Christian Balzer        Network/Systems Engineer
> ch...@gol.com           Rakuten Communications
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to