Hi Bairo,

On 12.09.2017 00:41, Blair Bethwaite wrote:
> On 12 September 2017 at 01:15, Blair Bethwaite
> <blair.bethwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Flow-control may well just mask the real problem. Did your throughput 
>> improve? Also, does that mean flow-control is on for all ports on the 
>> switch...? IIUC, then such "global pause" flow-control will mean switchports 
>> with links to upstream network devices will also be paused if the switch is 
>> attempting to pass packets from those ports down to a congested host.
> 
> Sorry, I didn't finish explaining that... The problem in the above
> scenario is that global-pause is link-level, so even if you have other
> flows destined for non-congested hosts on the same switch and plenty
> of upstream/fabric link capacity for them, those flows will also get
> paused due to a single congested downstream host. For any particular
> topology and congestion rate there is likely to be a tipping point.

Flow control was activated only on the 25 GBit/s ports. Those ports are
dedicated ports for ceph and traffic will not leave the switch. I used a
seperate vlan.

Regards,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to