On 17-09-20 08:06, nokia ceph wrote:
Hello,
Env:- RHEL 7.2 , 3.10.0-327.el7.x86_64 , EC 4+1 , bluestore
We are writing to ceph via librados C API . Testing with rados no
issues.
The same we tested with Jewel/kraken without any issue. Need your view
how to debug this issue?
maybe similar to http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21180? It seems it was
resolved for me with mentioned fix. You could apply mentioned config
options and see if it helps (and build newer version, if able).
>>
OSD.log
======
~~~
2017-09-18 14:51:59.895746 7f1e744e0700 0 log_channel(cluster) log
[WRN] : slow request 60.068824 seconds old, received at 2017-09-18
14:50:59.826849: MOSDECSubOpWriteReply(1.132s0 1350/1344
ECSubWriteReply(tid=971, last_complete=1350'153, committed=1,
applied=0)) currently queued_for_pg
2017-09-18 14:51:59.895749 7f1e744e0700 0 log_channel(cluster) log
[WRN] : slow request 60.068737 seconds old, received at 2017-09-18
14:50:59.826936: MOSDECSubOpWriteReply(1.132s0 1350/1344
ECSubWriteReply(tid=971, last_complete=0'0, committed=0, applied=1))
currently queued_for_pg
2017-09-18 14:51:59.895754 7f1e744e0700 0 log_channel(cluster) log
[WRN] : slow request 60.067539 seconds old, received at 2017-09-18
14:50:59.828134: MOSDECSubOpWriteReply(1.132s0 1350/1344
ECSubWriteReply(tid=971, last_complete=1350'153, committed=1,
applied=0)) currently queued_for_pg
2017-09-18 14:51:59.923825 7f1e71cdb700 10 trim shard target 102 M
meta/data ratios 0.5 + 0 (52428 k + 0 ), current 1359 k (1083 k + 276 k)
2017-09-18 14:51:59.923835 7f1e71cdb700 10 trim shard target 102 M
meta/data ratios 0.5 + 0 (52428 k + 0 ), current 1066 k (1066 k + 0 )
2017-09-18 14:51:59.923837 7f1e71cdb700 10 trim shard target 102 M
meta/data ratios 0.5 + 0 (52428 k + 0 ), current 643 k (643 k + 0 )
2017-09-18 14:51:59.923840 7f1e71cdb700 10 trim shard target 102 M
meta/data ratios 0.5 + 0 (52428 k + 0 ), current 1049 k (1049 k + 0 )
2017-09-18 14:51:59.923842 7f1e71cdb700 10 trim shard target 102 M
meta/data ratios 0.5 + 0 (52428 k + 0 ), current 896 k (896 k + 0 )
2017-09-18 14:51:59.940780 7f1e77ca5700 20 osd.181 1350 share_map_peer
0x7f1e8dbf2800 already has epoch 1350
2017-09-18 14:51:59.940855 7f1e78ca7700 20 osd.181 1350 share_map_peer
0x7f1e8dbf2800 already has epoch 1350
2017-09-18 14:52:00.081390 7f1e6f572700 20 osd.181 1350
OSD::ms_dispatch: ping magic: 0 v1
2017-09-18 14:52:00.081393 7f1e6f572700 10 osd.181 1350 do_waiters --
start
2017-09-18 14:52:00.081394 7f1e6f572700 10 osd.181 1350 do_waiters --
finish
2017-09-18 14:52:00.081395 7f1e6f572700 20 osd.181 1350 _dispatch
0x7f1e90923a40 ping magic: 0 v1
2017-09-18 14:52:00.081397 7f1e6f572700 10 osd.181 1350 ping from
client.414556
2017-09-18 14:52:00.123908 7f1e71cdb700 10 trim shard target 102 M
meta/data ratios 0.5 + 0 (52428 k + 0 ), current 1359 k (1083 k + 276 k)
2017-09-18 14:52:00.123926 7f1e71cdb700 10 trim shard target 102 M
meta/data ratios 0.5 + 0 (52428 k + 0 ), current 1066 k (1066 k + 0 )
2017-09-18 14:52:00.123932 7f1e71cdb700 10 trim shard target 102 M
meta/data ratios 0.5 + 0 (52428 k + 0 ), current 643 k (643 k + 0 )
2017-09-18 14:52:00.123937 7f1e71cdb700 10 trim shard target 102 M
meta/data ratios 0.5 + 0 (52428 k + 0 ), current 1049 k (1049 k + 0 )
2017-09-18 14:52:00.123942 7f1e71cdb700 10 trim shard target 102 M
meta/data ratios 0.5 + 0 (52428 k + 0 ), current 896 k (896 k + 0 )
2017-09-18 14:52:00.145445 7f1e784a6700 1 heartbeat_map is_healthy
'OSD::osd_op_tp thread 0x7f1e61cbb700' had timed out after 60
2017-09-18 14:52:00.145450 7f1e784a6700 1 heartbeat_map is_healthy
'OSD::osd_op_tp thread 0x7f1e624bc700' had timed out after 60
2017-09-18 14:52:00.145496 7f1e784a6700 1 heartbeat_map is_healthy
'OSD::osd_op_tp thread 0x7f1e63cbf700' had timed out after 60
2017-09-18 14:52:00.145534 7f1e784a6700 10 osd.181 1350 internal
heartbeat not healthy, dropping ping request
2017-09-18 14:52:00.146224 7f1e78ca7700 1 heartbeat_map is_healthy
'OSD::osd_op_tp thread 0x7f1e61cbb700' had timed out after 60
2017-09-18 14:52:00.146226 7f1e78ca7700 1 heartbeat_map is_healthy
'OSD::osd_op_tp thread 0x7f1e624bc700' had timed out after 60
~~~
thread apply all bt
Thread 54 (LWP 479360):
#0 0x00007f1e7b5606d5 in ?? ()
#1 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
Thread 53 (LWP 484888):
#0 0x00007f1e7a644b7d in ?? ()
#1 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
Thread 52 (LWP 484177):
#0 0x00007f1e7b5606d5 in ?? ()
#1 0x0000000a00000000 in ?? ()
#2 0x00007f1e88d8df98 in ?? ()
#3 0x00007f1e88d8df48 in ?? ()
#4 0x000000000000000a in ?? ()
#5 0x00007f1e5ccaf7f8 in ?? ()
#6 0x00007f1e7e45b9ee in ?? ()
#7 0x00007f1e88d8d860 in ?? ()
#8 0x00007f1e8e6e5500 in ?? ()
#9 0x00007f1e889881c0 in ?? ()
#10 0x00007f1e7e3e9ea0 in ?? ()
#11 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
Thread 51 (LWP 484176):
#0 0x00007f1e7b5606d5 in ?? ()
#1 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
Thread 50 (LWP 484175):
#0 0x00007f1e7b5606d5 in ?? ()
#1 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
Thread 49 (LWP 484174):
#0 0x00007f1e7b5606d5 in ?? ()
#1 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
~~~
Thanks
I think you may be missing debug packages as there are no thread names.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
