That's what I set it to in the config file. I probably should have mentioned that.
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:07 PM Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub <yeh...@redhat.com> wrote: > According to the log here, it says that the location constraint it got > is "cn", can you take a look at a tcpdump, see if that's actually > what's passed in? > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:02 PM, David Turner <drakonst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I run with `debug rgw = 10` and was able to find these lines at the end > of a > > request to create the bucket. > > > > Successfully creating a bucket with `bucket_location = US` looks like > > [1]this. Failing to create a bucket has "ERROR: S3 error: 400 > > (InvalidLocationConstraint): The specified location-constraint is not > valid" > > on the CLI and [2]this (excerpt from the end of the request) in the rgw > log > > (debug level 10). "create bucket location constraint" was not found in > the > > log for successfully creating the bucket. > > > > > > [1] > > 2018-02-26 19:52:36.419251 7f4bc9bc8700 10 cache put: > > > name=local-atl.rgw.data.root++.bucket.meta.testerton:bef43c26-daf3-47ef-a3a5-e1167e3f88ac.39099765.1 > > info.flags=0x17 > > 2018-02-26 19:52:36.419262 7f4bc9bc8700 10 adding > > > local-atl.rgw.data.root++.bucket.meta.testerton:bef43c26-daf3-47ef-a3a5-e1167e3f88ac.39099765.1 > > to cache LRU end > > 2018-02-26 19:52:36.419266 7f4bc9bc8700 10 updating xattr: > name=user.rgw.acl > > bl.length()=141 > > 2018-02-26 19:52:36.423863 7f4bc9bc8700 10 RGWWatcher::handle_notify() > > notify_id 344855809097728 cookie 139963970426880 notifier 39099765 > > bl.length()=361 > > 2018-02-26 19:52:36.423875 7f4bc9bc8700 10 cache put: > > name=local-atl.rgw.data.root++testerton info.flags=0x17 > > 2018-02-26 19:52:36.423882 7f4bc9bc8700 10 adding > > local-atl.rgw.data.root++testerton to cache LRU end > > > > [2] > > 2018-02-26 19:43:37.340289 7f466bbca700 2 req 428078:0.004204:s3:PUT > > /testraint/:create_bucket:executing > > 2018-02-26 19:43:37.340366 7f466bbca700 5 NOTICE: call to > > do_aws4_auth_completion > > 2018-02-26 19:43:37.340472 7f466bbca700 10 v4 auth ok -- > > do_aws4_auth_completion > > 2018-02-26 19:43:37.340715 7f466bbca700 10 create bucket location > > constraint: cn > > 2018-02-26 19:43:37.340766 7f466bbca700 0 location constraint (cn) > can't be > > found. > > 2018-02-26 19:43:37.340794 7f466bbca700 2 req 428078:0.004701:s3:PUT > > /testraint/:create_bucket:completing > > 2018-02-26 19:43:37.341782 7f466bbca700 2 req 428078:0.005689:s3:PUT > > /testraint/:create_bucket:op status=-2208 > > 2018-02-26 19:43:37.341792 7f466bbca700 2 req 428078:0.005707:s3:PUT > > /testraint/:create_bucket:http status=400 > > > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:36 PM Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub <yeh...@redhat.com > > > > wrote: > >> > >> I'm not sure if the rgw logs (debug rgw = 20) specify explicitly why a > >> bucket creation is rejected in these cases, but it might be worth > >> trying to look at these. If not, then a tcpdump of the specific failed > >> request might shed some light (would be interesting to look at the > >> generated LocationConstraint). > >> > >> Yehuda > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:29 AM, David Turner <drakonst...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Our problem only appeared to be present in bucket creation. Listing, > >> > putting, etc objects in a bucket work just fine regardless of the > >> > bucket_location setting. I ran this test on a few different realms to > >> > see > >> > what would happen and only 1 of them had a problem. There isn't an > >> > obvious > >> > thing that steps out about it. The 2 local realms do not have > >> > multi-site, > >> > the internal realm has multi-site and the operations were performed on > >> > the > >> > primary zone for the zonegroup. > >> > > >> > Worked with non 'US' bucket_location for s3cmd to create bucket: > >> > realm=internal > >> > zonegroup=internal-ga > >> > zone=internal-atl > >> > > >> > Failed with non 'US' bucket_location for s3cmd to create bucket: > >> > realm=local-atl > >> > zonegroup=local-atl > >> > zone=local-atl > >> > > >> > Worked with non 'US' bucket_location for s3cmd to create bucket: > >> > realm=local > >> > zonegroup=local > >> > zone=local > >> > > >> > I was thinking it might have to do with all of the parts being named > the > >> > same, but I made sure to do the last test to confirm. Interestingly > >> > it's > >> > only bucket creation that has a problem and it's fine as long as I put > >> > 'US' > >> > as the bucket_location. > >> > > >> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 6:48 PM F21 <f21.gro...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I am using the official ceph/daemon docker image. It starts RGW and > >> >> creates a zonegroup and zone with their names set to an empty string: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph-container/blob/master/ceph-releases/luminous/ubuntu/16.04/daemon/start_rgw.sh#L36:54 > >> >> > >> >> $RGW_ZONEGROUP and $RGW_ZONE are both empty strings by default: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph-container/blob/master/ceph-releases/luminous/ubuntu/16.04/daemon/variables_entrypoint.sh#L46 > >> >> > >> >> Here's what I get when I query RGW: > >> >> > >> >> $ radosgw-admin zonegroup list > >> >> { > >> >> "default_info": "", > >> >> "zonegroups": [ > >> >> "default" > >> >> ] > >> >> } > >> >> > >> >> $ radosgw-admin zone list > >> >> { > >> >> "default_info": "", > >> >> "zones": [ > >> >> "default" > >> >> ] > >> >> } > >> >> > >> >> On 20/02/2018 10:33 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote: > >> >> > What is the name of your zonegroup? > >> >> > > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 3:29 PM, F21 <f21.gro...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> I've done some debugging and the LocationConstraint is not being > set > >> >> >> by > >> >> >> the > >> >> >> SDK by default. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I do, however, need to set the region on the client to us-east-1 > for > >> >> >> it > >> >> >> to > >> >> >> work. Anything else will return an InvalidLocationConstraint > error. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Francis > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On 20/02/2018 8:40 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote: > >> >> >>> Sounds like the go sdk adds a location constraint to requests > that > >> >> >>> don't go to us-east-1. RGW itself is definitely isn't tied to > >> >> >>> us-east-1, and does not know anything about it (unless you happen > >> >> >>> to > >> >> >>> have a zonegroup named us-east-1). Maybe there's a way to > configure > >> >> >>> the sdk to avoid doing that? > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> Yehuda > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 1:54 PM, F21 <f21.gro...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >>>> I am using the AWS Go SDK v2 > >> >> >>>> (https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2) > >> >> >>>> to > >> >> >>>> talk > >> >> >>>> to my RGW instance using the s3 interface. I am running ceph in > >> >> >>>> docker > >> >> >>>> using > >> >> >>>> the ceph/daemon docker images in demo mode. The RGW is started > >> >> >>>> with a > >> >> >>>> zonegroup and zone with their names set to an empty string by > the > >> >> >>>> scripts > >> >> >>>> in > >> >> >>>> the image. > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> I have ForcePathStyle for the client set to true, because I want > >> >> >>>> to > >> >> >>>> access > >> >> >>>> all my buckets using the path: myrgw.instance:8080/somebucket. > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> I noticed that if I set the region for the client to anything > >> >> >>>> other > >> >> >>>> than > >> >> >>>> us-east-1, I get this error when creating a bucket: > >> >> >>>> InvalidLocationConstraint: The specified location-constraint is > >> >> >>>> not > >> >> >>>> valid. > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> If I set the region in the client to something made up, such as > >> >> >>>> "ceph" > >> >> >>>> and > >> >> >>>> the LocationConstraint to "ceph", I still get the same error. > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> The only way to get my buckets to create successfully is to set > >> >> >>>> the > >> >> >>>> client's > >> >> >>>> region to us-east-1. I have grepped the ceph code base and > cannot > >> >> >>>> find > >> >> >>>> any > >> >> >>>> references to us-east-1. In addition, I looked at the AWS docs > for > >> >> >>>> calculating v4 signatures and us-east-1 is the default region > but > >> >> >>>> I > >> >> >>>> can > >> >> >>>> see > >> >> >>>> that the region string is used in the calculation (i.e. the > region > >> >> >>>> is > >> >> >>>> not > >> >> >>>> ignored when calculating the signature if it is set to > us-east-1). > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> Why do my buckets create successfully if I set the region in my > s3 > >> >> >>>> client > >> >> >>>> to > >> >> >>>> us-east-1, but not otherwise? If I do not want to use us-east-1 > as > >> >> >>>> my > >> >> >>>> default region, for example, if I want us-west-1 as my default > >> >> >>>> region, > >> >> >>>> what > >> >> >>>> should I be configuring in ceph? > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> Thanks, > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> Francis > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ > >> >> >>>> ceph-users mailing list > >> >> >>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > >> >> >>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> ceph-users mailing list > >> >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > >> >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com