My thought is that in 4 years you could have migrated to a hypervisor that
will have better performance into ceph than an added iSCSI layer. I won't
deploy VMs for ceph on anything that won't allow librbd to work. Anything
else is added complexity and reduced performance.

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018, 11:49 AM Jason Dillaman <jdill...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Max Cuttins <m...@phoenixweb.it> wrote:
> > Sorry for being rude Ross,
> >
> > I follow Ceph since 2014 waiting for iSCSI support in order to use it
> with
> > Xen.
>
> What OS are you using in Dom0 that you cannot just directly use krbd?
> iSCSI is going to add an extra hop so it will never be able to match
> the performance of something that is directly talking to the OSDs.
>
> > When finally it seemds it was implemented the OS requirements are
> > irrealistic.
> > Seems a bad prank. 4 year waiting for this... and still not true support
> > yet.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Il 28/02/2018 14:11, Marc Roos ha scritto:
> >>
> >>   Hi Massimiliano, have an espresso. You know the indians have a nice
> >> saying
> >>
> >> "Everything will be good at the end. If it is not good, it is still not
> >> the end."
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Massimiliano Cuttini [mailto:m...@phoenixweb.it]
> >> Sent: woensdag 28 februari 2018 13:53
> >> To: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> >> Subject: [ceph-users] Ceph iSCSI is a prank?
> >>
> >> I was building ceph in order to use with iSCSI.
> >> But I just see from the docs that need:
> >>
> >>         CentOS 7.5
> >>         (which is not available yet, it's still at 7.4)
> >>         https://wiki.centos.org/Download
> >>
> >>         Kernel 4.17
> >>         (which is not available yet, it is still at 4.15.7)
> >>         https://www.kernel.org/
> >>
> >> So I guess, there is no ufficial support and this is just a bad prank.
> >>
> >> Ceph is ready to be used with S3 since many years.
> >> But need the kernel of the next century to works with such an old
> >> technology like iSCSI.
> >> So sad.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ceph-users mailing list
> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
>
> --
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to