PGs being unevenly distributed is a common occurrence in Ceph.  Luminous
started making some steps towards correcting this, but you're in Jewel.
There are a lot of threads in the ML archives about fixing PG
distribution.  Generally every method comes down to increasing the weight
on OSDs with too few PGs and decreasing the weight on the OSDs with too
many PGs.  There are a lot of schools of thought on the best way to
implement this in your environment which has everything to do with your
client IO patterns and workloads.  Looking into `ceph osd reweight-by-pg`
might be a good place for you to start as you are only looking at 1 pool in
your cluster.  If you have more pools, you generally need `ceph osd
reweight-by-utilization`.

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:19 AM shadow_lin <shadow_...@163.com> wrote:

> Hi list,
>        Ceph version is jewel 10.2.10 and all osd are using filestore.
> The Cluster has 96 osds and 1 pool with size=2 replication with 4096
> pg(base on pg calculate method from ceph doc for 100pg/per osd).
> The osd with the most pg count has 104 PGs and there are 6 osds have above
> 100 PGs
> Most of the osd have around 7x-9x PGs
> The osd with the least pg count has 58 PGs
>
> During the write test some of the osds have very high fs_apply_latency
> like 1000ms-4000ms while the normal ones are like 100-600ms. The osds with
> high latency are always the ones with more pg on it.
>
> iostat on the high latency osd shows the hdds are having high %util at
> about 95%-96% while the normal ones are having %util at 40%-60%
>
> I think the reason to cause this is because the osds have more pgs need to
> handle more write request to it.Is this right?
> But even though the pg distribution is not even but the variation is not
> that much.How could the performance be so sensitive to it?
>
> Is there anything I can do to improve the performance and reduce the
> latency?
>
> How can I make the pg distribution to be more even?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> 2018-03-07
> ------------------------------
> shadowlin
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to