On 2018-03-12 21:00, Ilya Dryomov wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 7:41 PM, Maged Mokhtar <mmokh...@petasan.org> wrote: 
> 
>> On 2018-03-12 14:23, David Disseldorp wrote:
>> 
>> On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 11:23:02 +0200, Maged Mokhtar wrote:
>> 
>> 2)I undertand that before switching the path, the initiator will send a
>> TMF ABORT can we pass this to down to the same abort_request() function
>> in osd_client that is used for osd_request_timeout expiry ?
>> 
>> IIUC, the existing abort_request() codepath only cancels the I/O on the
>> client/gw side. A TMF ABORT successful response should only be sent if
>> we can guarantee that the I/O is terminated at all layers below, so I
>> think this would have to be implemented via an additional OSD epoch
>> barrier or similar.
>> 
>> Cheers, David
>> 
>> Hi David,
>> 
>> I was thinking we would get the block request then loop down to all its osd
>> requests and cancel those using the same  osd request cancel function.
> 
> All that function does is tear down OSD client / messenger data
> structures associated with the OSD request.  Any OSD request that hit
> the TCP layer may eventually get through to the OSDs.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ilya

Hi Ilya, 

OK..so i guess this also applies as well to osd_request_timeout expiry,
it is not guaranteed to stop all stale ios.  

Maged
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to