Hi,

We have some buckets with ~25M files inside.

We've also using bucket index sharding. The performance is good, we are
focused on read.



BR,
Rafal Wadolowski


On 20.04.2018 00:57, Robert Stanford wrote:
>
>  The rule of thumb is not to have tens of millions of objects in a
> radosgw bucket, because reads will be slow.  If using bucket index
> sharding (with 128 or 256 shards), does this eliminate this concern? 
> Has anyone tried tens of millions (20-40M) of objects with sharded
> indexes?
>
>  Thank you
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to