Hi, We have some buckets with ~25M files inside.
We've also using bucket index sharding. The performance is good, we are focused on read. BR, Rafal Wadolowski On 20.04.2018 00:57, Robert Stanford wrote: > > The rule of thumb is not to have tens of millions of objects in a > radosgw bucket, because reads will be slow. If using bucket index > sharding (with 128 or 256 shards), does this eliminate this concern? > Has anyone tried tens of millions (20-40M) of objects with sharded > indexes? > > Thank you > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com