I think the second variant is what you need. But I'm not the guru in ceph-deploy so there might be some nuances there...

Anyway the general idea is to have just a single NVME partition (for both WAL and DB) per OSD.

Thanks,

Igor


On 6/27/2018 11:28 PM, Pardhiv Karri wrote:
Thank you Igor for the response.

So do I need to use this,

ceph-deploy osd create --debug --bluestore --data /dev/sdb --block-wal /dev/nvme0n1p1 --block-db /dev/nvme0n1p2 cephdatahost1

or

ceph-deploy osd create --debug --bluestore --data /dev/sdb --block-db /dev/nvme0n1p2 cephdatahost1

where /dev/sdb is ssd disk for osd
/dev/nvmen0n1p1 is 10G partition
/dev/nvme0n1p2 is 25G partition


Thanks,
Pardhiv K

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:08 AM Igor Fedotov <ifedo...@suse.de <mailto:ifedo...@suse.de>> wrote:

    Hi Pardhiv,

    there is no WalDB in Ceph.

    It's WAL (Write Ahead Log) that is a way to ensure write safety in
    RocksDB. In other words - that's just a RocksDB subsystem which
    can use separate volume though.

    In general For BlueStore/BlueFS one can either allocate separate
    volumes for WAL and DB or have them on the same volume. The latter
    is the common option.

    The separated layout makes sense when you have tiny but super-fast
    device (for WAL) and less effective (but still fast) larger drive
    for DB. Not to mention the third one for user data....

    E.g. HDD (user data) + SDD (DB) + NVME  (WAL) is such a layout.


    So for you case IMO it's optimal to have merged WAL+DB at NVME and
    data at SSD. Hence no need for separate WAL volume.


    Regards,

    Igor


    On 6/26/2018 10:22 PM, Pardhiv Karri wrote:
    Hi,

    I am playing with Ceph Luminous and getting confused information
    around usage of WalDB vs RocksDB.

    I have 2TB NVMe drive which I want to use for Wal/Rocks DB and
    have 5 2TB SSD's for OSD.
    I am planning to create 5 30GB partitions for RocksDB on NVMe
    drive, do I need to create partitions of WalDB also on NVMe drive
    or does RocksDB does same work as WalDB plus having metadata on it?

    So my question is do I really need to use WalDB along with
    RocksDB or having RocksDB only is fine?

    Thanks,
    Pardhiv K





    _______________________________________________
    ceph-users mailing list
    ceph-users@lists.ceph.com <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
    http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

    _______________________________________________
    ceph-users mailing list
    ceph-users@lists.ceph.com <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
    http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



--
*Pardhiv Karri*
"Rise and Rise again untilLAMBSbecome LIONS"



_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to