This was the issue (could not create the pool, because it would have exceeded the new (luminous) limitation on pgs /osd.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 10:35 AM David Turner <drakonst...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was confused what could be causing this until Janne's email. I think > they're correct that the cluster is preventing pool creation due to too > many PGs per OSD. Double check how many PGs you have in each pool and what > your defaults are for that. > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 7:19 AM Janne Johansson <icepic...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Did you change the default pg_num or pgp_num so the pools that did show >> up made it go past the mon_max_pg_per_osd ? >> >> >> Den fre 31 aug. 2018 kl 17:20 skrev Robert Stanford < >> rstanford8...@gmail.com>: >> >>> >>> I installed a new Luminous cluster. Everything is fine so far. Then I >>> tried to start RGW and got this error: >>> >>> 2018-08-31 15:15:41.998048 7fc350271e80 0 rgw_init_ioctx ERROR: >>> librados::Rados::pool_create returned (34) Numerical result out of range >>> (this can be due to a pool or placement group misconfiguration, e.g. pg_num >>> < pgp_num or mon_max_pg_per_osd exceeded) >>> 2018-08-31 15:15:42.005732 7fc350271e80 -1 Couldn't init storage >>> provider (RADOS) >>> >>> I notice that the only pools that exist are the data and index RGW >>> pools (no user or log pools like on Jewel). What is causing this? >>> >>> Thank you >>> R >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ceph-users mailing list >>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >> >> >> -- >> May the most significant bit of your life be positive. >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
