Sorry, I was wrong that it was you. I just double checked. But there is a new thread as of this morning about this topic where someone is running benchmark tests with numbers titled "Benchmark does not show gains with DB on SSD". On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 12:20 PM David Turner <drakonst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You already have a thread talking about benchmarking the addition of WAL > and DB partitions to an OSD. Why are you creating a new one about the > exact same thing? As with everything, the performance increase isn't even > solely answerable by which drives you have, there are a lot of factors that > could introduce a bottleneck in your cluster. But again, why create a new > thread for the exact same topic? > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 12:06 PM Marc Roos <m.r...@f1-outsourcing.eu> > wrote: > >> >> When having a hdd bluestore osd with collocated wal and db. >> >> >> - What performance increase can be expected if one would move the wal to >> an ssd? >> >> - What performance increase can be expected if one would move the db to >> an ssd? >> >> - Would the performance be a lot if you have a very slow hdd (and thus >> not so much when you have a very fast hdd (sas 15k)) >> >> - It would be best to move the wal first to the ssd, and then maybe also >> the db? >> >> In this CERN video (https://youtu.be/OopRMUYiY5E?t=931) of 2015 they are >> talking about 5-10x increase etc. But that is filestore of course. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
