On 16.01.19 16:03, Kenneth Van Alstyne wrote: > To be clear, I know the question comes across as ludicrous. It *seems* > like this is going to work okay for the light workload use case that I > have in mind — I just didn’t want to risk impacting the underlying > cluster too much or hit any other caveats that perhaps someone else has > run into before.
Why is setting up a distinct pool as destination for your RBD mirros not an option? Does it have to be an extra cluster? Regards -- Robert Sander Heinlein Support GmbH Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin https://www.heinlein-support.de Tel: 030 / 405051-43 Fax: 030 / 405051-19 Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg - HRB 93818 B Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein - Sitz: Berlin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
