So, I see the recommendation for 4% of OSD space for blocks.db/WAL and the corresponding discussion regrading the 3/30/300GB vs 6/60/600GB allocation.
How does this change when WAL is seperate from blocks.db? Reading [0] it seems that 6/60/600 is not correct. It seems that to compact a 300GB DB, you taking values from the above layer (which is only 10% of the lower layer and only some percentage that exceeds the trigger point of that will be merged down) and merging that in, so at worse case you would need 333GB (300+30+3) plus some headroom. [0] https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/wiki/Leveled-Compaction ---------------- Robert LeBlanc PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
