I posted to the ceph-iscsi github but Dillaman noted that 3.2 was version 10.  
Which means that wouldn’t solve the issue with the version 9 requirement of the 
current 14.2.2 nautilus.   Paul noted 3.1 is “pretty broken”, soo which version 
is version 9?  Or should I hack/patch the dashboard in 14.2.2 to accept version 
10 or 8?

 

-Brent

 

From: Kaspar Bosma <kaspar.bo...@home.nl> 
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 8:11 AM
To: Paul Emmerich <paul.emmer...@croit.io>; Brent Kennedy <bkenn...@cfl.rr.com>
Cc: ceph-users <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Iscsi in the nautilus Dashboard

 

Hi all,

That was not the most recent. This is it (3.2.4): 
https://2.chacra.ceph.com/r/ceph-iscsi/master/8a3967698257e1b49a9d554847b84418c15da902/centos/7/flavors/default/

Kaspar

Op 22 juli 2019 om 14:01 schreef Kaspar Bosma <kaspar.bo...@home.nl 
<mailto:kaspar.bo...@home.nl> >: 

Hi Brent,

You may want to have a look at the repos at shaman.ceph.com.

The latest (3.2.2) packaged version of Ceph iSCSI is located here:

https://4.chacra.ceph.com/r/ceph-iscsi/master/ff5e6873c43ab6828d3f7264526100b95a7e3954/centos/7/flavors/default/noarch/

You can also find related package repos for the tcmu-runner and ceph-iscsi-cli 
projects.

Regards, Kaspar

Op 22 juli 2019 om 12:52 schreef Paul Emmerich <paul.emmer...@croit.io 
<mailto:paul.emmer...@croit.io> >: 

Version 9 is the fqdn stuff which was introduced in 3.1.

Use 3.2 as 3.1 is pretty broken. 

 

Paul

 

-- 
Paul Emmerich 

Looking for help with your Ceph cluster? Contact us at https://croit.io 

croit GmbH 
Freseniusstr. 31h 
81247 München 
www.croit.io <http://www.croit.io>  
Tel: +49 89 1896585 90

 

 

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:24 AM Brent Kennedy < bkenn...@cfl.rr.com 
<mailto:bkenn...@cfl.rr.com> > wrote: 

I have a test cluster running centos 7.6 setup with two iscsi gateways ( per 
the requirement ).  I have the dashboard setup in nautilus ( 14.2.2 ) and I 
added the iscsi gateways via the command.  Both show down and when I go to the 
dashboard it states:

 

“ Unsupported `ceph-iscsi` config version. Expected 9 but found 8.  “

 

Both iscsi gateways were setup from scratch since the latest and greatest 
packages required for ceph iscsi install are not available in the centos 
repositories.  Is 3.0 not considered version 9?  ( did I do something wrong? ) 
Why is it called/detected as version 8 when its version 3?

 

I also wondering, the package versions listed as required in the nautilus 
docs(http://docs.ceph.com/docs/nautilus/rbd/iscsi-target-cli/)  state x.x.x or 
NEWER package, but when I try to add a gateway gwcli complains about the 
tcmu-runner and targetcli versions and I have to use the 

Skipchecks=true option when adding them.  

 

Another thing came up, might be doing it wrong as well:  

Added a disk, then added the client, then tried to add the auth using the auth 
command and it states: “Failed to update the client's auth: Invalid password”

 

Actual output:

/iscsi-target...erpix:backup1> auth username=test password=test

CMD: ../hosts/<client_iqn> auth *

username=test, password=test, mutual_username=None, mutual_password=None

CMD: ../hosts/<client_iqn> auth *

auth to be set to username='test', password='test', mutual_username='None', 
mutual_password='None' for 'iqn.2019-07.com.somgthing:backup1'

Failed to update the client's auth: Invalid username

 

Did I miss something in the setup doc?

 

Installed packages:

rtslib:  wget https://github.com/open-iscsi/rtslib-fb/archive/v2.1.fb69.tar.gz

target-cli: wget 
https://github.com/open-iscsi/targetcli-fb/archive/v2.1.fb49.tar.gz 

tcmu-runner: wget 
https://github.com/open-iscsi/tcmu-runner/archive/v1.4.1.tar.gz 

ceph-iscsi: wget https://github.com/ceph/ceph-iscsi/archive/3.0.tar.gz 

configshell: wget 
https://github.com/open-iscsi/configshell-fb/archive/v1.1.fb25.tar.gz 

 

Other bits I installed as part of this:

yum install epel-release python-pip python-devel -y

yum groupinstall "Development Tools" -y

python -m pip install --upgrade pip setuptools wheel

pip install netifaces cryptography flask

 

 

Any helps or pointer would be greatly appreciated!

 

-Brent

 

Existing Clusters:

Test: Nautilus 14.2.2 with 3 osd servers, 1 mon/man, 1 gateway, 2 iscsi 
gateways ( all virtual on nvme )

US Production(HDD): Nautilus 14.2.1 with 11 osd servers, 3 mons, 4 gateways 
behind haproxy LB

UK Production(HDD): Luminous 12.2.11 with 25 osd servers, 3 mons/man, 3 
gateways behind haproxy LB

US Production(SSD): Luminous 12.2.11 with 6 osd servers, 3 mons/man, 3 gateways 
behind haproxy LB

 

 

_______________________________________________ 
ceph-users mailing list 
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>  
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com 

_______________________________________________ 
ceph-users mailing list 
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>  
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com 


 

_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list 
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>  
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


 

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to