OK, thanks.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 6:07 PM Wido den Hollander <w...@42on.com> wrote: > > > On 10/25/19 5:27 AM, luckydog xf wrote: > > Hi, list, > > > > Currently my ceph nodes with 3 MON and 9 OSDs, everything is fine. > > Now I plan to add onre more public network, the initial public network > > is 103.x/24, and the target network is 109.x/24. And 103 cannot reach > > 109, as I don't config route table for them. > > > > I add 109.x for 3 MON nodes and they could reach one another, and I > add > > ---- > > That will not work. Make sure there is routing between the IP-space. > That's the easiest and probably only way to make this work. > > Wido > > > public_network = 172.16.103.0/24 <http://172.16.103.0/24>, > > 172.16.109.0/24 <http://172.16.109.0/24> > > ---- > > After I manually change monmap file and run `ceph -s` > > ----- > > services: > > mon: 6 daemons, quorum > > > cephnode001,cephnode002,cephnode003,cephnode001-109,cephnode002-109,cephnode003-109 > > ---- > > I check 6789 for both 103.x and 109.x is listening properly. But I mount > > cephfs through IP 109.x, it fails. > > > > I use tcpdump and find there does have traffic directed to 109.x > > interfaces of 3 MON host. > > > > Anything wrong? Is it doable to have 2 public networks(subnets), served > > for connections sourced from different subnets? I.E, 109 network for > > connection from 109.x, while 103 network for 103.x? > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
