On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 10:13 AM Stefan Bauer <s...@plzk.de> wrote: > > Paul, > > > i would like to take the chance, to thank you and ask if it could not be, that > subop_latency reports high value (is that avgtime in seconds reported?) > because the communication partner is slow in writing/commiting?
no Paul > > > Dont want to follow the red hering :/ > > > We have the following times on our 11 osds. Attached image. > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Paul Emmerich <paul.emmer...@croit.io> > Gesendet: Donnerstag 7 November 2019 19:04 > An: Stefan Bauer <stefan.ba...@cubewerk.de> > CC: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > Betreff: Re: [ceph-users] how to find the lazy egg - poor performance - > interesting observations [klartext] > > You can have a look at subop_latency in "ceph daemon osd.XX perf > dump", it tells you how long an OSD took to reply to another OSD. > That's usually a good indicator if an OSD is dragging down others. > Or have a look at "ceph osd perf dump" which is basically disk > latency; simpler to acquire but with less information > > Paul > > -- > Paul Emmerich > > Looking for help with your Ceph cluster? Contact us at https://croit.io > > croit GmbH > Freseniusstr. 31h > 81247 München > www.croit.io > Tel: +49 89 1896585 90 > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 6:55 PM Stefan Bauer <s...@plzk.de> wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > we are running a 3 node proxmox-cluster with - of corse - ceph :) > > > > ceph version 12.2.12 (39cfebf25a7011204a9876d2950e4b28aba66d11) luminous > > (stable) > > > > > > 10G network. iperf reports almost 10G between all nodes. > > > > > > We are using mixed standard SSDs (crucial / samsung). We are aware, that > > these disks can not delivery high iops or great throughput, but we have > > several of these clusters and this one is showing very poor performance. > > > > > > NOW the strange fact: > > > > > > When a specific node is rebooting, the throughput is acceptable. > > > > > > But when the specific node is back, the results dropped by almost 100%. > > > > > > 2 NODES (one rebooting) > > > > > > # rados bench -p scbench 10 write --no-cleanup > > hints = 1 > > Maintaining 16 concurrent writes of 4194304 bytes to objects of size > > 4194304 for up to 10 seconds or 0 objects > > Object prefix: benchmark_data_pve3_1767693 > > sec Cur ops started finished avg MB/s cur MB/s last lat(s) avg > > lat(s) > > 0 0 0 0 0 0 - > > 0 > > 1 16 55 39 155.992 156 0.0445665 > > 0.257988 > > 2 16 110 94 187.98 220 0.087097 > > 0.291173 > > 3 16 156 140 186.645 184 0.462171 > > 0.286895 > > 4 16 184 168 167.98 112 0.0235336 > > 0.358085 > > 5 16 210 194 155.181 104 0.112401 > > 0.347883 > > 6 16 252 236 157.314 168 0.134099 > > 0.382159 > > 7 16 287 271 154.838 140 0.0264864 > > 0.40092 > > 8 16 329 313 156.481 168 0.0609964 > > 0.394753 > > 9 16 364 348 154.649 140 0.244309 > > 0.392331 > > 10 16 416 400 159.981 208 0.277489 > > 0.387424 > > Total time run: 10.335496 > > Total writes made: 417 > > Write size: 4194304 > > Object size: 4194304 > > Bandwidth (MB/sec): 161.386 > > Stddev Bandwidth: 37.8065 > > Max bandwidth (MB/sec): 220 > > Min bandwidth (MB/sec): 104 > > Average IOPS: 40 > > Stddev IOPS: 9 > > Max IOPS: 55 > > Min IOPS: 26 > > Average Latency(s): 0.396434 > > Stddev Latency(s): 0.428527 > > Max latency(s): 1.86968 > > Min latency(s): 0.020558 > > > > > > > > THIRD NODE ONLINE: > > > > > > > > root@pve3:/# rados bench -p scbench 10 write --no-cleanup > > hints = 1 > > Maintaining 16 concurrent writes of 4194304 bytes to objects of size > > 4194304 for up to 10 seconds or 0 objects > > Object prefix: benchmark_data_pve3_1771977 > > sec Cur ops started finished avg MB/s cur MB/s last lat(s) avg > > lat(s) > > 0 0 0 0 0 0 - > > 0 > > 1 16 39 23 91.9943 92 0.21353 > > 0.267249 > > 2 16 46 30 59.9924 28 0.29527 > > 0.268672 > > 3 16 53 37 49.3271 28 0.122732 > > 0.259731 > > 4 16 53 37 36.9954 0 - > > 0.259731 > > 5 16 53 37 29.5963 0 - > > 0.259731 > > 6 16 87 71 47.3271 45.3333 0.241921 > > 1.19831 > > 7 16 106 90 51.4214 76 0.124821 > > 1.07941 > > 8 16 129 113 56.492 92 0.0314146 > > 0.941378 > > 9 16 142 126 55.9919 52 0.285536 > > 0.871445 > > 10 16 147 131 52.3925 20 0.354803 > > 0.852074 > > Total time run: 10.138312 > > Total writes made: 148 > > Write size: 4194304 > > Object size: 4194304 > > Bandwidth (MB/sec): 58.3924 > > Stddev Bandwidth: 34.405 > > Max bandwidth (MB/sec): 92 > > Min bandwidth (MB/sec): 0 > > Average IOPS: 14 > > Stddev IOPS: 8 > > Max IOPS: 23 > > Min IOPS: 0 > > Average Latency(s): 1.08818 > > Stddev Latency(s): 1.55967 > > Max latency(s): 5.02514 > > Min latency(s): 0.0255947 > > > > > > > > Is here a single node faulty? > > > > > > > > root@pve3:/# ceph status > > cluster: > > id: 138c857a-c4e6-4600-9320-9567011470d6 > > health: HEALTH_WARN > > application not enabled on 1 pool(s) (thats just for > > benchmarking) > > > > services: > > mon: 3 daemons, quorum pve1,pve2,pve3 > > mgr: pve1(active), standbys: pve3, pve2 > > osd: 12 osds: 12 up, 12 in > > > > data: > > pools: 2 pools, 612 pgs > > objects: 758.52k objects, 2.89TiB > > usage: 8.62TiB used, 7.75TiB / 16.4TiB avail > > pgs: 611 active+clean > > 1 active+clean+scrubbing+deep > > > > io: > > client: 4.99MiB/s rd, 1.36MiB/s wr, 678op/s rd, 105op/s wr > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > Stefan > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list > > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
