I'm not too keen on the -legacy thing, because it's not language agnostic. However it seems to be a trend. At 30c3 they do exactly that:
https://twitter.com/arambartholl/statuses/416612652539191296/photo/1/large Best regards, Maciej On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have long used "5" as an indicator that the 5ghz channel was better. > This goes back to a long thread on nanog, like 4? 5? years ago, where > the hope was to train users that "5" was better. > > Well, it's turned out that 5 is frequently better, but not always, AND > that clients tend to go for the shortest of the SSIDs available. So a > thought would be to create another ad-hoc standard for deprecating 2.4 > ghz, and have the shorter SSID be the 5ghz one. > > Ideas for the 2ghz channel: > > CEROwrt-legacy > CEROwrt2 > > I'm not huge on "legacy" because it's rather long but am stuck for > standards, I'd like a default 2.4 ghz SSID that clearly indicates the > real use to which 2.4ghz is suitable, like: > CEROwrt-GET-OFF-MY-BABY-MONITOR-YOU-FREAK > > ideas for another ssid naming standard slightly longer than a single > digit that would make sense to mom? > > -- > Dave Täht > > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: > http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel