On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Greg White <g.wh...@cablelabs.com> wrote: > On 4/18/14, 1:05 PM, "Dave Taht" <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Greg White <g.wh...@cablelabs.com> >>wrote: >>> >>> The choice of RTTs also came from the web traffic captures. I saw >>> RTTmin=16ms, RTTmean=53.8ms, RTTmax=134ms. >> >>Get a median? > > Median value was 62ms. > >> >>My own stats are probably quite skewed lower from being in california, >>and doing some tests from places like isc.org in redwood city, which >>is insanely well >>co-located. > > Mine are probably skewed too. I was told that global median (at the time I > collected this data) was around 100ms.
Well, the future is already here, just not evenly distributed. Nearly every sample I'd taken at the same time as from, almost entirely from major cities, came in at under 70ms median. It strikes me that a possibly useful metric would be object size vs RTT, over time. > -- Dave Täht NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_indecent.article _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
