>>>>> "SK" == Simon Kelley <[email protected]> writes:

SK> A valid point, but "every leaf system has to be a recursor" is not a
SK> pleasant outcome of widely implementing DNSSEC.

>From a security POV, every system needs its own local verifier, and every
administrative domain needs its own recursor.  Optimally every system will
have its own validating recursor.

SK> I wonder, do the browser-based validators suffer from this, or are
SK> they recursors under the hood?

They are full validating recursors.  Often using libunbound to do the
heavy lifting.

-JimC
--
James Cloos <[email protected]>         OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

Reply via email to