On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <t...@toke.dk> wrote: > Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Any objections here? > > Yes! I certainly wouldn't want to run that.
Not a problem. You are fortunate enough to have stable ipv6 addresses where you are - and me, I have to go bat-s**t crazy everytime I get renumbered finding all the places that don't handle it properly and rebooting them. So if renumbering is not the PITA it is for me, for most of you, I merely want to make the ability to have some form of translation available for those that can't put up with it, and won't make it be the default. Also as aaron points out, better firewalling/dmz of ipv6 is on the agenda too. Not that I have either time, or money, or a lot of interest, in fixing anything but wifi in the next few months. >> Suggestions for how to make one of the ipv6 translation techniques >> work right? > > Turn them off? ;) > > -Toke -- Dave Täht Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again! https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
