On 2015-03-16 17:58, Dave Taht wrote: > I folded in the following: > > * minstrel-blues As far as I know, this is not really "minstrel-blues", this is a minor set of minstrel tweaks.
> * minstrel patches for minimum variance (hurts udp, helps tcp) Is this the same patches that you sent a while back? > * babel-1.6.0 release candidate > * cake and the usual slew of alternate bufferbloat-fighting qdiscs > > I intended to use this build to test my ubnt gear and the archer c7v2. > It is NOT cerowrt... > > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero3/ubnt/ar71xx/ Where's the source? I can't find it on your github... > 1) But before I even got so far as trying that build, ran across this > ticket. > > https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/19194 Haven't seen any similar reports from other people yet, might be a device specific quirk or broken hw or something, I don't know yet. > 2) Is the consensus here we should resume using the "device naming by > security model" mode? > > 3) Things I would like to be developing and then testing > * latest dnsmasq code (with fixed date getting stuff to hopefully > finally make it up to openwrt) > * latest FIB patches backported to 3.18 (or, possibly, moving to 4.0) The FIB patches that went into 4.0 are already in OpenWrt trunk ;) - Felix _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
