On 03/16/2015 01:49 PM, David Lang wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
1) We need a new box that can do inbound shaping at up to 300mbit.
So far
that box has not appeared. We have not explored policing as an
alternative.
If you are using a x86 processor, how much cpu does this take?
diddly.
this isn't sold as an AP, it's a bit pricy, but not insanely expensive
($200-250 depending on options)
1GHz dual core AMD cpu, 4G 1066RAM 2 mini PCIe 3xGid-E
I'm currently running the following as the Gateway/DNS/DHCP for the mid
level startup (40 people) I work for.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16856205007
I added 4gigs of ram and the cheapest SSD I could find.
It does inbound/outbound shaping on our 100/15Mbit link and when I slam
the link with netperf-wrapper top tells me the cpu is about 30% used.
I don't have any log files but when I tested this box in-line on a GigE
network I seem to remember it being able to do far above 100Mbit but I
don't remember how much more.
It's running a custom build of BB. Custom because the dual GigE network
chipset is not recognised by by openwrt BB and I had make a small patch
to fix that but every thing else is stock BB. QOS is qos-scripts
scripts and not a version of sqm-scripts. When I got it all going I
didn't full recognize that all the sqm stuff was not in qos-scripts. It
works and currently meets our needs so I've not felt much need to mess
with it.
It has a PCI-E x1 slot so you could add a wireless adapter.
Sadly its out of stock now but there are probably plenty more options if
we started looking for them.
--
Richard A. Smith
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
