On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Jonathan Morton <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >>> On 23 Mar, 2015, at 03:45, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> are we running into performance issues with fq_codel? I thought all the >>> problems were with HTB or ingress shaping. >> >> Cake is, in part, a response to the HTB problem; it is a few percent more >> efficient so far than an equivalent HTB+fq_codel combination. It will have >> a few other novel features, too.
And we have a much more efficient version of codel, which may help a bit also. Still, really need to get back to profiling *the entire path* on these itty bitty platforms. Look forward to getting the FIB patches working on them, but that's a hairy lot of patches to backport. Might be easier wasn't really planning on making chaos calmer's freeze >> Bobbie is a response to the ingress-shaping problem. A policer (with no >> queue) can be run without involving an IFB device, which we believe has a >> large overhead. > > yep. > > 3rd option is to go make better hardware. Not getting very far on this > https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/onetswitch/onetswitch-open-source-hardware-for-networking > > going to have to try harder. Honestly had hoped that broadcom, qca, > cisco, or somebody making chips would have got it right by now. > >> - Jonathan Morton >> > > > > -- > Dave Täht > Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again! > > https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb -- Dave Täht Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again! https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
