one of the more enjoyable internet drafts I have read lately.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> Date: Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 2:52 PM Subject: [homenet] draft-chroboczek-babel-doesnt-care-00 To: Alia Atlas <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected], [email protected] Dear Alia, [Homenet and babel-users in copy of this mail.] In a previous conversation, you suggested I write down an applicability statement for Babel. However, I got bored in the middle, and ended up writing this: Babel doesn't care. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chroboczek-babel-doesnt-care-00 Please don't let the somewhat flippant title put you off -- somewhere within the verbiage, you will find an applicability statement (in Section 1.1). For people who are not familiar with Babel, I've done my best to give a protocol outline in Section 2 that might be easier to digest than RFC 6126. To my knowledge, there is nothing outright incorrect in this document, and I've removed almost all the jokes before submitting. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet -- Dave Täht Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again! https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
