Hi Jonathan, > On Mar 13, 2016, at 21:15 , Jonathan Morton <chromati...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On 13 Mar, 2016, at 20:25, moeller0 <moell...@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> I also fondly remember my 3310, but I certainy do not want to go back there, >> that week of standby be damned ;) > > I don’t actually use my 3310 very much - it’s there for emergencies more than > anything else. But I do think it makes a better phone than my Android > phablet. > > The latter is pretty good at the whole “internet terminal” and “utility app” > thing, but it’s a pretty lousy phone. Indeed the “make a phone call” > functionality is presented as just another app, albeit one that can’t be > uninstalled. I can’t even type a text message any faster on it (to the same > accuracy) than on my 3310. It works adequately as a phone, rather than well.
My sentiment as well; only I realized I value a mobile internet terminal (with acceptable phone capability) more than an excellent phone without internet access ;) > >> while the password could be randomized, I envision user unhappiness with >> randomized SSIDs > > I don’t see why - that’s the one they don’t have to type, because it gets > scanned for. > > A straight random string of characters from the base64 or base85 character > sets would be hard to recognise or read out loud, but I was thinking more > along the lines of picking randomly from wordlists, so you’d get SSIDs of the > form “AdjectiveNoun” which are relatively easy to recognise and remember, yet > still likely to be locally unique. > > Passwords chosen by a similar method (ie. virtual diceware) would also be > easier to type, etc. CorrectHorseBatteryStaple… I had considered this, but looking at the SSIDs in my neighborhood, people either stick to the default or pick something clever/funny; and dice ware will not allow those users to fulfill their wittiness. For passwords that might work, have people “roll” a fresh one until they like the result … > >> That reminds me a bit of https://www.securifi.com/almondplus > > The eye-watering price is certainly notable. It’s unclear how much of that > is profit margin, and how much went into the screen. I note also the > touchscreen UI, at which I have to squint to work out what each icon is for > (despite the bright, high-res colour screen). The price is putting this well into the life-style accessory terrain ;) (I wonder whether this thing actually sells, but its main selling point is the display so I thought it relevant to the current discussion). > > There’s a lot to be said for the old Amstrad PCW type of UI. Very little > window dressing, straight down to business. > >> The keypad is sort of helpful to put in say IP addresses (or passwords with >> a T9 like numerical hash for words system). I have used old HP on printer >> interfaces to configure IP networking, not an experience I would recommend >> to emulate (not that you are doing tis, but please keep the failures of old >> in mind when designing your system). > > I just looked up a few HP printer manuals to see what you’re talking about. > Setting numerical values by incremental button presses does sound tedious - > but I already knew that from badly-designed microwave ovens. The cheap ones > come with a clockwork dial, which is actually easier to use than the typical > “increment 10 mins, 1 min or 10 sec” buttons. I deliberately bought a good > one with a digital dial. > > At university, I often saw people routinely set the microwave timer for 10 > minutes, simply because it required fewer button presses than the correct > setting. We had a lot of false fire alarms. > > But I’m not presently considering putting buttons on the device itself. The > screen will be a significant expense in itself; adding enough buttons to be a > worthwhile input device sounds like another big cost. But there’ll be a USB > port somewhere anyway, and most users will have something worthwhile to plug > into it. Honestly, if it is not self sufficient, then an display-only solution seems inferior to even a mediocre web-interface, given that everybody (requiring to set-up a router) probably is browser-proficient already. Having the display in addition is superior for sure. > > Clearly a keyboard will be the preferred input device. Though there are many > national layouts, we can rely on arrow keys, a full Latin alphabet, Arabic > numerals, space, backspace and return giving consistent keycodes. Or at > least, we can once we correct for QWERTY/QWERTZ/AZERTY/Dvorak quirks - we can > prompt the user to press the Z key to distinguish between these. Rapid and > accurate navigation and data entry should then be easy. I believe using a web browser for access solves these issues quite elegantly ;) > > As a subtype of keyboards, though, there are standalone numeric keypads, > essentially the part missing from a laptop keyboard. Those may merit special > consideration - they don’t have a Z key. > > There are established ways of navigating menus and entering text using > console controllers - since that’s a problem consoles themselves have had to > solve. It’s clunky, but somehow they get people to pay $60 per game for the > privilege of entering CD key codes this way. > > It should also be feasible to allow a mouse to be used. Almost all mice > these days have a scroll wheel, which we can use to scan through the > character set instead of trying to squeeze a virtual keyboard onto the > screen. Navigation would be by pointing, left-click to select, right-click > to cancel/exit. If this comes as an additional/emergency method to access the device this all sounds great, but as the main method that does not seem to be superior to a reasonably well made web-interface (or as much as I dislike those an “app” interface). But I am fully aware that this is a) a matter of taste and b) my taste is quite peculiar (meaning I have no clue what the “masses” will like). > > If this sounds like a complex solution to a problem - maybe it is, at the > design level. I think users will find it simple. That matters more. > >> Well, a lot of ISP supplied routers have a sticker on the back giving >> exactly the information (in addition to the password for the web-gui) > > My Buffalo router has such a sticker. It says the web-UI login is > root/(blank). That, right there, is my best argument against Web > configuration interfaces - they are impossible to secure in the factory-fresh > state. I can only speak for my ISP, but each device has a unique(?) password/passcode (which might be trivially deduced from serial and/or mac numbers). So if DTAG can pull this through so could OEMs/ODMs (that after all build the devices the ISPs distribute in the first place). Best Regards Sebastian > > - Jonathan Morton > _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel