Hi Seb, someone did just that and even better, compared two builds with the dnsmasq being the only variable, and did not see any differences: https://forum.openwrt.org/t/security-advisory-2021-01-19-1-dnsmasq-multiple-vulnerabilities/85903/85
From other comments, looks like they found the bug and are testing the fix. https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/staging/ldir.git;a=commitdiff;h=9a18346676850646764072ffcfd32ad9396d95c3 Jonathan > On Jan 22, 2021, at 4:40 PM, Sebastian Moeller <moell...@gmx.de> wrote: > > Could you try to run top or htop and look at the CPU load? I could imagine > that the fixes dnsmasq might have some CPU spikes that simply leave not > enough cycles for the traffic shaper? > > Best Regards > Sebastian > >> On Jan 22, 2021, at 22:25, Jonathan Foulkes <j...@jonathanfoulkes.com> wrote: >> >> I figure there should be no inter-dependencies there, but the side-effect of >> the new dnsmasq is pretty serious. >> >> I did not install .6, I only performed an opkg update of the dnamasq package >> itself. So kernal is the same in my case. >> >> But others running a full .6 build report similar QoS issues. >> >> I regressed back to .4 and all is good on the QoS front, waiting until a new >> drop of dnsmasq before trying again. >> >> - Jonathan >> >>> On Jan 22, 2021, at 4:15 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <t...@toke.dk> wrote: >>> >>> Jonathan Foulkes <j...@jonathanfoulkes.com> writes: >>> >>>> I installed the updated package on a 19.07.4 box running cake, and QoS >>>> performance went down the tubes. >>>> Last night it locked up completely while attempting to stream. >>>> >>>> See the PingPlots others have posted to this forum thread, mine look >>>> similar, went from constant sub 50ms to very spiky, then some loss, loss >>>> increasing, and if high traffic, lock-up. >>>> https://forum.openwrt.org/t/security-advisory-2021-01-19-1-dnsmasq-multiple-vulnerabilities/85903/39 >>>> >>>> load is low, sirq is low, so box does not seem stressed. >>>> >>>> Any reason Cake would be sensitive to a dnsmasq bug? >>> >>> No, not really. I mean, dnsmasq could be sending some traffic that >>> interferes with stuff? Or it could be a kernel regression - the release >>> did bump the kernel version as well... >>> >>> -Toke >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bloat mailing list >> bl...@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat > _______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
