I'm using the Seeed Odyssey https://www.seeedstudio.com/ODYSSEY-X86J4105864-p-4447.html
It will shape inbound using cake (piece of cake) at 1Gbps. Dual Intel i210 controllers. I'm running stable OpenWRT, although I needed to use ToT to get a UEFI boot setup for it that would work with the internal eMMC. But it has hilariously more storage and memory that I need for a border router. I _can_ completely utilize a single core with cake on inbound traffic, so I'd like to sort out multiqueue (needs a newer kernel version with a newer driver from Intel), but I haven't bothered, since it seems to handle things well, and I rarely sustain 1Gbps downloads. I use the most aggressive ACK filtering setting with cake due to the 30:1 asymmetry on the link. On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 3:54 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Cerowrt-devel < cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <t...@toke.dk> > To: Matt Taggart <m...@lackof.org>, cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:54:08 +0100 > Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Looking for MORE SQM Router Recommendations ! > Matt Taggart <m...@lackof.org> writes: > > > On 3/16/21 11:30 AM, Charles Rothschild via Cerowrt-devel wrote: > > > > > I want a 1GB capable SQM router. What options are good nowadays hw > wise? > > > > I've been using the Qotom x86 boxes and running x86 OpenWRT on them. > > They have no problem doing CAKE on 1gig symmetrical connection. > > > > http://qotom.net/ and then Products -> Mini PC -> Multiple NIC > > > > But the Qotom vendor site is confusing and also doesn't list all the > > products you can find available. So a while ago I made this decoder ring > > > > https://we.riseup.net/lackof/x86-router-candidates#qotom > > Nice list! One comment - the page says this: > > > The Intel AES-NI cpu extension can really help openssl/wireguard a lot > > That is true for openssl (and other TLS, even IPSec, I think), but not > for wireguard - that doesn't use AES at all, but rather ChaCha20, which > is not accelerated by AES-NI (and doesn't need it either). > > -Toke > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Cerowrt-devel" < > cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net> > To: Matt Taggart <m...@lackof.org>, cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 03:54:14 -0700 (PDT) > Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Looking for MORE SQM Router Recommendations ! > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >
_______________________________________________ Cerowrt-devel mailing list Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel