There are EV certificates as well, for which wildcards are strongly disallowed.

On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:55:34AM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Regarding wildcard certs, we had the following exchange...
> 
> On 3/31/10 4:15 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > On 3/18/10 1:54 PM, Michael Str??der wrote:
> >> Joe Orton wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 07:07:31AM +0300, ArkanoiD wrote:
> >>>> Second level domain MUST NOT be wildcarded, thus *.com is invalid and 
> >>>> should
> >>>> never match. (as well as "*", of course)
> >>>
> >>> I don't think it's appropriate for the draft to specify any requirement 
> >>> beyond the "left-most label" rule, so far as wildcards go.  I could 
> >>> imagine a "*.local" or similar could be useful to allow, and *.com is 
> >>> really little more dangerous than *.co.uk.
> >>
> >> Good point with *.co.uk but I'd draw the opposite conclusion from it:
> >> I'd rather like to see wildcards forbidden completely or at least strongly
> >> discouraged.
> > 
> > I would, too. There are significant security concerns with them (related
> > to phishing attacks and such).
> > 
> > However, some CAs will issue wildcard certs to certificate holders who
> > are more highly verified (e.g., Class 2 certificates requiring identity
> > verification of some kind). So I think this is an open issue.
> 
> This issue is still open. :)
> 
> The general approach I would take is to say this:
> 
> 1. If the wildcard character is included in a cert, it MUST be the
> entire left-most domain label (per IESG position).
> 
> 2. A certification authority SHOULD NOT include the wildcard character
> in certificates unless it has appropriate safeguards, strong identity
> checking, or high trust in the recipient (e.g., "Class 2" or "Class 3"
> certificates -- speaking of which, are these terms defined anywhere?).
> 
> 3. We need to clearly document the security problems with wildcard certs
> so that CAs can intelligently decide whether to issue them.
> 
> Peter
> 
> -- 
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> email protected and scanned by AdvascanTM - keeping email useful - 
> www.advascan.com 
> 
> 



> _______________________________________________
> certid mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid

_______________________________________________
certid mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid

Reply via email to