12 maj 2010 kl. 16:23 skrev =JeffH: > ..which is ambiguous because X.501 does not explicitly state which RDN in the > DN sequence is the most specific (it's implied) and there allegedly exist > non-trivial slices of current practice don't necessarily follow that > stipulation anyway (for whatever reasons).
rfc5280 claims that dn are hierarchical, and it make sense when you apply name constraints on the subject DN (permitted/excluded subtree). Love _______________________________________________ certid mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid
