On 6/9/10 11:52 PM, Kaspar Brand wrote: > On 10.06.2010 04:18, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>> The definition of "CN-ID" in section 1.3 should probably also be adapted >>> (i.e., it should explicitly forbid multi-CN RDNs). >> >> Is this a more accurate definition? >> >> * CN-ID = a subject Distinguished Name (DN) whose constituent >> sequence of Relative Distinguished Names (RDNs) contains one >> and only one attribute value assertion (AVA) whose attribute >> type is Common Name (CN) > > I think it's better to refer to it at the RDN level (as is the case for > -05): > > * CN-ID = a Relative Distinguished Name (RDN) in the certificate > subject which contains one and only one attribute value > assertion (AVA) whose attribute type is Common Name (CN)
I think that's better, thanks. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ certid mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid
