At 4:42 PM +0200 6/19/10, Michael Ströder wrote: >Alexey Melnikov wrote: >> Paul Hoffman wrote: >>> No, I'm saying that the order in which you are supposed to take the >>> DCs has historically been unclear. "Most significant" means different >>> things to different people. >>> >> I probably sound like a broken record, but the order is very clear for >> LDAP. I don't see why is this going to be different for X.509 certificates. > >Yes, I concur RFC 2247 is pretty clear and is meant to be applied to X.500 >names as well.
...and you think that all (or even typical) PKIX implementers read either of those documents? _______________________________________________ certid mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid
