On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 03:36:03PM -0700, =JeffH wrote: > hey folks, > > We're getting feedback on the [email protected] list wrt > draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check. > > In particular, there's a question about the requirement to order the list > of reference identifiers in section "4.2. Constructing an Ordered List of > Reference Identifiers" that would be good to have implementors (in > particular) weigh in on. > > i.e. is the ordering requirement strictly necessary protocol-wise? Is it > (only) perhaps an implementation hint? > > thanks, > > =JeffH
So, apart from the exchange Paul and I had on this topic on i...@ietf, no-one else has expressed an opinion. So it looks like we're going in the direction of removing the requirement. -- Shumon Huque University of Pennsylvania. _______________________________________________ certid mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid
