On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 16:31 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Finally, although theoretically some consider the order of AVAs > within an RDN to have meaning, in practice that rule is not observed. > An AVA of type CN to be valid at any position within the subject > field.
The last sentence is missing a verb. Also, I don't see how AVAs within an RDN could ever have a meaningful order. The RDN is a "SET OF" AVAs, i.e., unordered. The encoding order is not significant; in fact, it is fixed by DER. -- Matt _______________________________________________ certid mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/certid
