Sorry, that "he" below was logically construed as me in that case, thanks for the note about the English language.

>>I'd say he's more bent than folded! ;-) jk!

>Ok. I was NOT referring to you Chunshen, and "considering the fact that I
>have done you some favours" I do not appreciate your tone. Be that as it
>may, I can let it go. However I do have another comment to make.
>I am only posting this on-list because I don't have your private email
>address handy...
>The fact that you can get so easily bent out of shape over something you did
>not understand in the first place graphically illustrates the fact that you
>seriously need to do something to improve your English.
>I am a patient person but many others are not. If you keep on the way you
>have been, one day you are going to take the moral high ground with the
>wrong person and find yourself in a heap of doo-doo.
>I urge you to get yourself an English tutor and forget the technical stuff
>for the time being.
>
>-Patrick
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chunshen  Li
>
>>I'd say he's more bent than folded! ;-) jk!
>Meant to entertain you and all and myself too, what's all that "folded"
>is about? a chair to be folded? Shame on you, considering the fact
>you've done me some favor I'll stop right here.
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Chunshen Li
>>
>>Brillian follow-up at least in two folds:
>
>
>Outbound email scanned for viruses. (e230)
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to