larry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 10:30 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: terror threat [Timeout?]
>
>
> impossible, they lost last night...... ;-) but I do want the
> flames to win the cup....
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lyons, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 10:26 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: terror threat [Timeout?]
>
>
> If I may, I'd like to suggest that we all drop this thread
> right now and talk about something more important. Calgary
> Flames in 4 games to win the Stanley Cup!
>
> larry
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 10:07 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: terror threat [Timeout?]
> >
> >
> > Ok, I am considering this. I still think you are wrong. I
> > didn't call her any names, though I grant you that "tedious
> > and predictable" comes close. I suppose it may not be that
> > tedious and predictable if you have NOT already been through
> > the "but Clinton this" and "but Clinton that" stuff a few
> > times. Or been through the immigration debate with one too
> > many bigots.
> >
> > If you want to be technical, I did apologize for calling her
> > boring, though I made a joke out of it. I actually don't
> > think it's much of an insult in that she inserted herself
> > into a discussion and then complained about how boring it
> > was. Why was she there then?
> >
> > Her remarks more than meet the dictionary definition of
> > chauvinism. And she does sound pretty young. I notice that
> > she isn't arguing the point.
> >
> > I don't quite see what I would be apologizing for. But hey.
> > Explain it to me if you would at [EMAIL PROTECTED] As I said
> > early in the thread, I am willing to believe it's me.
> > Theoretically anyway :)
> >
> > I don't have your email address handy or I'd already be
> > offline with this discussion.
> >
> > Dana
> >
> >
> > >It's also one thing to make personal attacks because one is upset.
> > >
> > >"monique, anyone ever tell you that bored people are
> really boring?"
> > >"You sound pretty young" "your chauvinsitic little world view"
> > >"You're worse. You're tedious and predictable"
> > >
> > >I've been called on personal insults before while trying to make a
> > >point, or when things get too heated. I usually back down and
> > >apologise.But that's just me.
> > >
> > >And that's all I was referring to.
> > >Not who's opinion is right or wrong.
> > >
> > >-Gel
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: dana tierney
> > >
> > >It's one thing to have prejudices and another to refuse to examine
> > >them. Humph.
> > >
> > >The Yoda thing was slightly funny yesterday, especially as it was
> > >already over. This morning it's kinda annoying. The woman
> > said I have
> > >no right to criticize cause I wasn't born here. Excuse me,
> > but that is
> > >simply not the case. I will gladly say so to anyone *else*
> > that thinks
> > >I should go back to Canada if I don't agree with George Bush.
> > >
> > >Is that all right with you, Gel? I mean really, geez.
> > >
> > >Dana
> > >
> > >---
> > >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > >Version: 6.0.614 / Virus Database: 393 - Release Date: 3/5/2004
> >
> >
> _____
>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
