2am. at least you missed the rush hour traffic. ;) With that little
sleep, I'd have been a walking zombie for the next day or so.
As for AI, the problem was that Spielburg was trying to finish a
Stanley Kubrick film. If not anything else, Kubrick is abstract.
larry
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:21:02 -0400, C. Hatton Humphrey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I see you survived your drive back to the wilds of New York.
> >
> > It does look like a good movie, but given the movie industry's record
> > of butchering Asimov's stories (anyone remember that atrocity called
> > Nightfall?), I'm going to remain skeptical.
>
> Yeah, I made it back but didn't get in until about 2:00am and then had
> to be at ITT to teach my 8am SQL Server class... glad that's a class
> that I enjoy teaching!
>
> It looks a *lot* like AI to me, which was just a bit too surrealistic
> for my tastes.
>
> Hatton
>
>
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- It's coming... C. Hatton Humphrey
- Re: It's coming... Larry C. Lyons
- Re: It's coming... Phill B
- Re: It's coming... C. Hatton Humphrey
- RE: It's coming... Larry C. Lyons
- RE: It's coming... Ian Skinner
- Re: It's coming... Larry C. Lyons
- Re: It's coming... Kevin Graeme
- Re: It's coming... Larry C. Lyons
- Re: It's coming... Kevin Graeme
- Re: It's coming... Larry C. Lyons
- Re: It's coming... William H Bowen
- Re: It's coming... Larry C. Lyons
- RE: It's coming... Raymond Camden
- Re: It's coming... William H Bowen