eliminating all the evidence?
Hard enough for someone with a meth lab to eliminate all the evidence
of that, much less nuclear bombs.
moreover... if you had weapons of mass destruction, would you not have
them for a reason, and therefore want to keep them rather than getting
rid of them and having to start over from scratch? It's not like the
guy who flushes his crank down the toilet when he knows the DEA is
onto him -- he can't just flush it and get some more the next day.
> :)
> Seriously tho, everyone is like "See, they can't find
> them..."
> DUH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> !!!!!!!!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 2:25 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: OReilly vs. Moore
> Yes, and if you were superman, you'd probably dress as
> Clark Kent to so that
> no one would know your secret identity.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Monique Boea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 1:17 PM
>> To: CF-Community
>> Subject: RE: OReilly vs. Moore
>>
>> One more...
>>
>> About them not being able to find WMD:
>>
>> Do you think if I had a meth lab in my basement and knew
>> the DEA were
>> on the
>> way, I would not totally get rid of any eveidence that I
>> was making drugs
>> in
>> my house?
s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
