I think it simply gives them (law talkin' guys) one more thing to charge the exploiters with.
Lack of documentation might be more proveable.
Like charging people with tax evasion because they don't have a tax stamp on a bag of pot.
my USD0.02
will
>How does requiring more documentation of photo shoots prevent sexual
>exploits of children? Is the thinking that if you increase the amount
>of required documentation (which the exploiters are already not
>providing) that the exploiters will decide to stop or be easier to
>catch?
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- Re: pain in the ass Bill Wheatley
- Re: pain in the ass Howie Hamlin
- Re: pain in the ass Bill Wheatley
- Re: pain in the ass Kevin Graeme
- Re: pain in the ass Doug White
- RE: pain in the ass Marlon Moyer
- Re: pain in the ass Bill Wheatley
- RE: pain in the ass Harkins, Patrick
- Re: pain in the ass Howie Hamlin
- Re: pain in the ass S . Isaac Dealey
- William Bowen