Interesting stuff.
<outbind://27/www.inthesetimes.com> www.inthesetimes.com.
According to this, Both Bush and Powell were told not to say certain things
because the information was not verifiable or came from shaky sources and
they did anyways. The article slants it to the left a bit, however the
sources are from unclassified and declassified documents and present a
fairly objective view.
_____
From: Andy Ousterhout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 10:23 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: today's Kerryism
Not about the "he lied about WMD's." I haven't seen any facts other then
that
all of the info he had indicated that they did in fact exist.
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 7:40 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
Says who, I've been able to back up everything I've said with outside
verifiable evidence. Unlike some.
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:09:38 -0500, Andy Ousterhout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sam,
> In case you haven't caught on yet, when it comes to Bush, Larry doesn't
worry
> about the facts -- he adjusts them to fit his intense dislike of the
man.
>
> Andy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 11:11 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: today's Kerryism
>
> Dude, are you going senile?
> How many times do we have to go over this?
> Bush didn't lie about any of those.
>
> -sm
>
> --- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I do not think that Kerry would have lied multiple
> > times about WMD's,
> > direct support of Al-Queda, trying to procure yellow
> > cake uranium etc.
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
