do we not consider them a threat?
Not my problem if Kim Jong has Nodong! :)
Then again, there are those who would not particularly miss LA, right? <g>
Besides, some of my statements are not intended to be authorities, but to make
people think. and to keep things in perspective. As one faithful lost posted
said; "Doug is opinionated."
What is really scary is that on the right/left quiz recently discussed, I was
within 1/2 point of Sam! Now is that "Fair and balanced?"
----- Original Message -----
From: Larry C. Lyons
Um Doug, I don't think your statement regarding North Korea is
accurate. The Nodong II missle does have enough range (just barely) to
hit US territory. There is another varient, Nodong III that can
possibly hit LA.
Nodong - perhaps a comment on Kim Jong Il - dictator of North Korea?
larry
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:26:24 -0500, Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sam Morris
>
> If a country is a known threat and seek WMD's they
> will need to be stopped. Many nations now have nuclear
> weapons; the one we're most worried about is Korea
> because they threaten to use it. Prove you are not a
> threat and we'll let you be.
>
> -sm
>
> So your position now is that a country cannot even seek WMD? Well when do
we
> invade Syria, Iran, China, India, France, Russia, Argentina, Colombia and
> Pakistan? Are they not also a threat to the US?
>
> For your information, Korea is not threatening to use WMD, they are only
> offering it for sale as international trade, to raise money with which to
feed
> its starving populace. You can pretty well bet that when N. Korea is
considered
> a real threat to the region, China will be the first to put them down. N.
Korea
> is not currently a threat to the US.
>
> Although you state that anything negative about the Bush administration is
all
> lies, one must still consider the majority of polls that show that the
American
> people are of the impression that the reason that the US invaded Iraq was
due to
> their stockpiles of WMD. How did they get that impression if not
specifically
> stated that way or strongly implied by the current President and his
> administration?
>
> The reason the administration is trying its best to distance themselves
from
> the Swift boat stuff, is because they do not consider it as being true. This
is
> from their own statements. It doesn't matter one whit whether you believe
it or
> not.
>
> It doesn't matter that you say the Iraq connections to Al Q are lies, the
Bush
> and Cheny campaign speeches as late as this week still claim there is a
> connection.
>
> I want to hope and believe that the majority of the American voters do not
> wish the US to be the international bully they are currently perceived as,
and
> will vote their conscience accordingly this November.
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
