does not.
If you read what I have written I have not said, use web standards and screw
IE. I said it is easier to develop something in a standards compliant
browser and then go ahead and make it work with IE correctly than to get it
working in IE first and then make it work with compliant browsers.
Sandy Clark
http://www.shayna.com <http://www.shayna.com/>
CF Pretty Accessible at http://www.shayna.com/blog
Now offering 4 days Hands on CSS training October 11-14th. Rockville, MD.
For more information go to:
http://www.teratech.com/training/oc_classes.cfm#css
_____
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 10:44 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: IE Browser
Nobody was saying not to use standards. But since IE is still far and
away the big slice of pie, it behoves a developer to not rely on the
parts of the standards that IE can't use. And to be knowledgeable of
how IE's non-standard implementations of the standards (e.g. box
model).
Oh, and you do know there's no such thing as future-proof, right? :-)
> We've gotten to this mindset where we honestly believe we need to write
> sites to a particular browser or another.
I didn't see anyone suggest that they were writing just to the
idiosynchracies of one particular browser at the expense of others. I
did see them say that since IE is the major player that you do have to
test for it.
-Kevin
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
