It is? I have been accepting it as fact. If it isn't true where did it
come from? I thought they were paying $1000 or something to the
families of suicide bombers?

Dana

----- Original Message -----
From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:43:39 -0500
Subject: RE: The Republican Fear Machine is at it again
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

It is not, but his statement wasn't connected to 9/11 either.  Just a straight
statement of fact that was incorrect.

Andy

  -----Original Message-----
  From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 6:23 PM
  To: CF-Community
  Subject: Re: The Republican Fear Machine is at it again

  granted but this is connected to 9/11 how exactly? It's like the
  British saying gee, there are problems in the Shankhill district, so
  let's invade Holland.

  Dana

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:45:20 -0500
  Subject: RE: The Republican Fear Machine is at it again
  To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  Gruss,
  While you can argue about Iraq's interaction with Al Q., your statement
below
  is false.  It is a well known fact that they were funding suicide bombers in
  Israel.

  Andy

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

    Iraq, on the other hand, had nothing to do with terrorism so we *can*
    make the "zero to thousands"
argument.________________________________________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to