Andy, have to do somethng right now and I'd like to look back at the
history a little before I answer you but there are two pretty decent
answers here already. Granted that the French can be infuriating and
possibly had their own agenda... it would have been nice to see more
support and consensus.
In general, if a whole lot of people say you are wrong, perhaps you
should consider the idea that you are wrong. Consider I say, because
it is also possible that you are not... but I don't think the concept
was even considered.
At the time, I felt that the discussion was very rushed and that the
question was railroaded through. It smelled like the Patriot Act. That
was why I was against it. Once we were there, we were responsible.
As for a specific this or that event happening differently... I can't
right now, but I'll see if I can answer anon :)
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:01:57 -0500
Subject: Re: The politicization of the Iraq War
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Good point - continuing, I'd be hesitant to grant permission to my
kid again after he'd burned my trust.
With Mr. Bush, all Americans have to take some responsibility his
actions. That's why we can't just pull out of Iraq; we have to clean
up the mess we entrusted Mr. Bush not to make.
Mr. Bush, however, should be terminated for abuse of authority.
----- Original Message -----
From: G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Using your analogy, if my child is not responsible enough to be out
until midnight, and gets himself/herself in trouble as a result, I'm
partially responsible for the misconduct by granting the privelege in
the first place.________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
