Maybe a little 'over done' (pardon my French), but you could look at it more
simply: just as you cannot prove that god does not exists, you cannot prove
god does exists. Science can explain why people use a concept like god and
it is really not relevant trying to proove some content of a concept.

>From: Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Here we go again....
>Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:36:11 -0400
>
>This is kinda funny, maybe this what sparked this whole debate, I dunno,
>but I got my new Wired Magazine today, and noticed the cover story:
>
>http://www.wired.com/wired/
>
>At 03:39 PM 9/29/2004, you wrote:
> >No, it shouldn't. A proper science class will explain the scientific
>method
> >and then deal with science. The problem is that science is being used as
>a
> >hammer to beat those who believe in God by saying that God does not exist
> >(something they have never and can never prove so is outside of science).
>In
> >response, the religious (or some of them) push for their side over
>science.
> >What's needed is good teaching guidelines, not fights.
> >As an aside, you can't scientifically prove love, poetry, hate, or a very
> >large number of other things. Science examines the world, the physical,
>the
> >tangible. It has deeeeep problems with the psychological, metaphysical,
>etc.
> >Anyone who foolishly says that science disproves God should be asked to
> >prove love. :)
> >
> >   _____
> >
> >And thus...shouldn't be taught in a public science classroom.
> >
> >Wow....we've finally come full circle :)
> >   ----- Original Message -----
> >   From: Michael Dinowitz
> >   To: CF-Community
> >   Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 2:19 PM
> >   Subject: RE: Here we go again....
> >
> >   I really havn't read most of the discussion, but yes, testing for the
> >   existance of God is outside the realm of science.
> >
> >     _____
> >
> >   From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >   Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 3:07 PM
> >   To: CF-Community
> >   Subject: Re: Here we go again....
> >
> >   sounds like a good summation of the discussion to me.
> >
> >   To add one point though,
> >
> >   Ergo it is not within the realm of Science therefore not a topic of
> >   scientific investigation.
> >
> >   larry
> >
> >   <snip>
> >   _____
> >
> >----------
> >[<http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=t:5>Todays Threads]
> >[<http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:129636>This Message]
> >[<http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5>Subscription]
> >[<http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=12823.11631.5>Fast
> >Unsubscribe] [<http://www.houseoffusion.com/signin/>User Settings]
> >[<https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?amount=&item_name=House+of+Fusion&business=donations%40houseoffusion.com&undefined_quantity=&cmd=_xclick>Donations
> >and Support]
> >
> >----------
> ><http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=38>
> >[]
> >
>
>=============================================
>Ray Champagne - Senior Application Developer
>CrystalVision Web Site Design and Internet Services
>603.433.9559
>www.crystalvision.org
>=============================================
>
>The information contained in this transmission (including any attached
>files) is CONFIDENTIAL and is intended only for the person(s) named
>above. If you received this transmission in error, please delete it
>from your system and notify us immediately. If you are not an intended
>recipient, please note that any use or dissemination of the information
>contained in this transmission (including any attached files) and the
>copying, printing, or retransmission of that information is strictly
>prohibited. You can notify us by return email or by phone at 603.433.9559.
>Thank you.
>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to