idea, not his, by the way.
However, in a less heated tone, I'd like to point out that the
proposed laws would merely replace one set of flawed laws with another
set of flawed laws, even more repressive to women. Personally I think
the current system is bad enough :)
<rant>
It would be nice if people would quit using their children as
bargaining chips. If they can't let go of their grievances against
each other then, in my opinion, maybe neither should have custody. It
is of course the children who suffer when good men can't see their
children, and when bad men keep their mothers from moving someplace
where there is work. I don't think it does the children much good
either when child support is based on what the man "can afford" as
opposed to what the children need to live, or for that matter when
mothers who need to go to work as a result of this asinine policy are
presumed to be bad parents.
</rant>
Dana
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:52:32 -0600, dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> oh yeah, good idea. Keep em barefoot and pregnant.
>
> Dana
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:31:25 -0400
> Subject: family law
> To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I don't have high hopes myself, but some or all of this would be good
> news.
>
> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,133875,00.html
>
> s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
> new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
>
> add features without fixtures with
> the onTap open source framework
>
> http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
> http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1
> http://www.fusiontap.com________________________________
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
