How is bringing up WMD "mean"? How dare someone call the administration on their deceit? Its really mena to splatter egg on the face of the President?
Or am I missing something here? -----Original Message----- From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 2:54 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Alleged RE: Dying for the United Nations I dont think WMD in Iraq are even alleged any more. It's considered impolite and generally "mean" to bring them up :) Dana On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:57:38 -0700, Ken Ketsdever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is especially important when going to war. What about goign to war in Iraq? > Where is the proof? > > If they were detected, then they're not alleged. Physical proof is required > to move something from alleged to actual. It's semantics, but important. > > > Much like the alleged tests in South Africa. > > > Alleged nukes. :) > > > > Truth is, they have none and have been running a con on the > > world for dozens > > of years now. If the Arabs ever found out that there are no > > nukes, they > > would invade Israel yesterday. But that's pure speculation on my part. > > > > > Damn it! I put a disclaimer in my post then pulled it out > > > thinking it might incite more than it clarified. Please > > > note I also included nailing the US for our renewed Nuclear > > > Program. Israel was only mentioned as a friend (give me some > > > room on this one please) with nukes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=36 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:132186 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
