maybe I'm missing something - didn't the story come out yesterday and the clarifications today?
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:11:34 -0500, Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is not news because it was already reported on. Were any new facts > introduced? If not, why re-introduce this old story now? > > -----Original Message----- > From: dana tierney > > Andy, it is news because someone credible alleges they were stolen due > to US negligeance. There is another side of the story, where different > people say that this is not the case. It's called balanced news > coverage. When there is confusion as to the facts, an attempt is made > to reflect all points of view. > > Dana > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:24:23 -0500, Andy Ousterhout wrote: > > Dana, > > So why is this news? And if not news, why show it? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dana tierney > > > > Sam > > > > I saw this story -- including the bit about were not there when tropps > > arrived -- on CNN this morning. Chill. > > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:55:40 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris > > wrote: > > > The liberal media at it again. > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=35 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:132866 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
