I am not being irresponsible. There is no legitimate data suggesting anything other than a lot of wishful thinking on the part of people who made a huge emotional investment in Kerry winning. Anyone who is hell-bent on proving that Kerry won, regardless of what the facts say, should re-think their own view of democracy.
But like I said, I am all in favor of a re-count, as long as I don't have to pay for it. There are plenty of rich Democrats who would be lining up to write checks in support of a recount if they thought there was something to the "we wuz robbed" chant now making the rounds on the Left. But none of them are stepping forward because they know that Bush won the election. If Kerry had won by 3.5 million votes overall and by clear margins of victory in states like Ohio and Florida I would be the first one telling the losing side to swallow the bitter pill and move on. Four years from now we'll have a new President-elect, and who knows, it may even be a Clinton. > Gruss wrote: > Had Mr. Kerry won would you be so glib and irresponsible? > > From what I've read there's legitimate scientific data suggesting at > best wide spread error and at worst fraud. Anybody that isn't > concerned about that should rethink their view of democracy. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:135833 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
