<alert> If you use the Microsoft natural keyboards (wireless included) I would caution against pulling the keys off to clean. Microsoft has a nice little rubber barrier that rips when you do this... Instead, unscrew the bottom and drop the key plate out.... Viola, use the brush on your vacuum and go to town!
</alert> :-) Mike ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - RUWebby http://www.ruwebby.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:139905 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54 From jeff Tue Dec 14 23:33:23 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 15:33:23 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: archive@jab.org Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:33:23 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx121.postini.com ([64.18.0.35] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeMAV-0003UY-00 for <archive@jab.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:33:23 -0800 Received: from source ([64.118.64.245]) by exprod5mx121.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:36:00 PST Received: from LOCALHOST by LOCALHOST with ESMTP id E27E5D31C5B32F43AC6AFD81A45209F8 Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:37:36 -0500 Subject: RE: what's in -your- keyboard? From: "Michael T. Tangorre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:34:53 -0500 References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-pstn-levels: (S:59.39738/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.5022 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> forward (good recip) [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.64 <alert> If you use the Microsoft natural keyboards (wireless included) I would caution against pulling the keys off to clean. Microsoft has a nice little rubber barrier that rips when you do this... Instead, unscrew the bottom and drop the key plate out.... Viola, use the brush on your vacuum and go to town! </alert> :-) Mike ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - RUWebby http://www.ruwebby.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:139905 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54 From jeff Tue Dec 14 23:33:23 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 15:33:23 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: archive@mail-archive.com Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:33:23 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx116.postini.com ([64.18.0.88] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeMAV-0003Uh-00 for <archive@mail-archive.com>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:33:23 -0800 Received: from source ([62.21.96.16]) (using TLSv1) by exprod5mx116.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:36:01 MST Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=vorlon.icpnet.pl ident=mailman) by mail.pld-linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CeMD2-0004P1-Ku; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:36:00 +0100 Received: from smtp.wp.pl ([212.77.101.160]) by mail.pld-linux.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.42) id 1CeMD1-0004Nn-4I for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:35:59 +0100 Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.wp.pl 29551 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2004 00:35:27 +0100 Received: from e158.ds.univ.gda.pl (HELO [153.19.196.158]) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) by smtp.wp.pl (WP-SMTPD) with SMTP for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 15 Dec 2004 00:35:27 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:39:49 +0100 From: Tomek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl-PL; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040928 X-Accept-Language: pl, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "PLD: Users list (Polish)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy poczty Wirtualnej Polski S. A. X-WP-SPAM: NO AS1=NO(Body=1 Fuz1=1) AS2=NO(0.499985) AS3=NO AS4=NO Subject: cdemu - jak to zainstalowac na PLD ac X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "PLD: Users list \(Polish\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Id: "PLD: Users list \(Polish\)" <pld-users-pl.pld-linux.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-users-pl>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Archive: <http://lists.pld-linux.org/pipermail/pld-users-pl> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-users-pl>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1588123559==" Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-pstn-levels: (S:29.66875/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 --===============1588123559== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Aby to zainstalowac musze skompilowac sobie modul. zrodla kernela 2.6.8 atlon mam ale on ciagle wyrzucal jakies bledy wiec uruchomnilem: make menuconfig i po tym zapisalem zmiany. Nawet skompilowalem jadro: make bzImage (aby powstaly pliki configuracyjne) ale ono nie jest kompatybilne z tym ktorego uzywam z [PLD rpm] wiec cdemu nie moge zaladowac. Czy mozna to zrobic nie kompilujac calego jadra(modulow) od nowa, tylko ustawic tam jakies pliki konfiguracyjne w zrodle? Chcialbym pozostac przy oryginalnym kernelu z PLD i doinstalowac tylko modul cdemu. Prosze o oswiecenie Pozdrawiam !!! Tomek --===============1588123559== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pld-users-pl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-users-pl --===============1588123559==-- From jeff Tue Dec 14 23:33:25 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 15:33:25 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: archive@mail-archive.com Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:33:25 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx117.postini.com ([64.18.0.89] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeMAX-0003Ux-00 for <archive@mail-archive.com>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:33:25 -0800 Received: from source ([64.118.64.245]) by exprod5mx117.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:36:04 EST Received: from LOCALHOST by LOCALHOST with ESMTP id 35FE9498BC35B94A96324A000D5E4B1E Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:37:34 -0500 Subject: RE: death for scott peterson From: Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:34:41 -0500 References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.5022 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> forward (good recip) [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 I think he was being cynical. If you only look at the facts you want to see, then the case can be misrepresented into a totally different issue. Ray At 02:32 PM 12/14/2004, you wrote: >I fail to see the revelance of the first two lines. > >Are you implying that because he was white, that they must have really had >solid evidence that he was guilty in order to convict >him? > >-Gel > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jerry Johnson > >Scott Peterson, a white man, was convicted of killing his wife. >OJ Simpson, a black man, was not convicted of killing his wife. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - CFDynamics http://www.cfdynamics.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:139853 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54 From jeff Tue Dec 14 23:33:21 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 15:33:21 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: archive@mail-archive.com Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:33:21 -0800 Received: from exprod5mx123.postini.com ([64.18.0.37] helo=psmtp.com) by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeMAT-0003UP-00 for <archive@mail-archive.com>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:33:21 -0800 Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx123.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:36:01 EST Received: (qmail 84061 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2004 23:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list-post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 84043 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2004 23:36:00 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from jnumail1.state.ak.us (HELO jnumail1.state.ak.us) (146.63.248.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 15:35:56 -0800 Received: from smtpj.state.ak.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jnumail1.state.ak.us (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:36:53 -0900 (AKST) Received: from [146.63.189.136] by smtpj.state.ak.us (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:36:52 -0900 (AKST) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:36:51 -0900 From: Elaine Nance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Question on timeout In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 ) X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 Maybe the timeout settings? or set up TCPMonitor and see whats going back and forth. Yu Feng wrote: > Thanks for help! > > The computer where this connection problem occurs is our application server, > so I haven't got a chance to replace network card. However, it runs all > other non-Axis applications ok that require Internet connection. > > The exact SocketTimeoutException problem also happened in the computers that > I said "almost always receives response" -- but very rarely and I couldn't > recreate it if I aim to. So somehow I think that application server computer > just had worse network configuration that couldn't survive a query most > time. I am wondering if there're some software aspect approach I can look > into? > > I once heard about TCP_NODELAY setup in registry, but apparently there're no > such setting in any computers here. > > Yu Feng > > -----Original Message----- > From: Elaine Nance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 2:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Question on timeout > > > I would bet that the Network Interface Card (NIC) is not working > properly, if it is an issue only for one computer. Or that the > patch cord for the computer is bad, for example if someone > tripped over it, and so on. > > Yu Feng wrote: > > >>>Hi, >>> >>>I have been bothered by a time-out issue for quite a few days and wonder >>>if I can get some help from the mailing list. >>> >>>We have a Axis 1.1 client application that connects to a remote Web >>>Service written also in Axis 1.1. The application almost always receives >>>response in all computers excepts one. In that one particular computer, >>>most time it gets SocketTimeoutException as reported widely in Internet: >>> >>>AxisFault >>>faultCode: {http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/}Server.userException >>>faultSubcode: >>>faultString: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out >>>faultActor: >>>faultNode: >>>faultDetail: >>>{http://xml.apache.org/axis/}stackTrace: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: >>>Read timed out >>>at java.net.SocketInputStream.socketRead0(Native Method) >>>at java.net.SocketInputStream.read(Unknown Source) >>>... >>> >>>The only answer I found so far is to increase the timeout value (more than >>>60 seconds) of the binding stub. That didn't work for us. >>> >>>However, the application gets response sometimes (about 5% of all the >>>times we tried) without any change. >>> >>>This convinced me that this might be a computer configuration issue. It >>>has same general configuration as another computer that worked -- Windows >>>2000, dynamic IP, on the same network. >>> >>>Somebody would have some clue? >>> >>>Thanks! >>>Yu Feng > > > -- > <~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. > | -- Pablo Picasso -- > <~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > -- <~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. | -- Pablo Picasso -- <~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
